Blog

  • A NATION RISES TO RECLAIM ITS SOUL: OBAMA, NEWSOM, WALZ, AND SANDERS LAUNCH THE AMERICAN HOMES & FUTURES INITIATIVE

    HOMELESSNESS FOREVER, BUILD 6 MILLION HOMES, CREATE 35 MILLION JOBS, AND RESTORE DIGNITY TO EVERY FAMILY

    Sacramento, California – February 2026

    This morning, on the sun-drenched steps of the Governor’s Mansion, four of the most enduring progressive leaders of our time did not merely speak.

    They drew a line in history.

    Former President Barack Obama, California Governor Gavin Newsom, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, and Senator Bernie Sanders stood together — not as politicians seeking applause, but as architects of a new American covenant.

    They unveiled the American Homes & Futures Initiative: a sweeping, battle-ready national plan to eradicate chronic homelessness within a decade, construct 6 million permanently affordable and climate-resilient homes, generate 35 million high-quality union jobs, and dismantle the structural inequities that have turned shelter into a privilege rather than a right.

    This is not another report gathering dust.

    This is a unified declaration of war on despair — built on proven results, scaled with ruthless ambition, and fueled by an uncompromising moral clarity.

    Obama opened with the quiet thunder that once steadied a fractured nation:

    “Housing is not a commodity to be traded. It is the foundation of everything we claim to cherish: safe childhoods, stable families, productive work, vibrant communities, real democracy. When millions live one paycheck from the street, when veterans sleep under bridges they once defended, when children do homework in cars — we are not a wealthy country pretending to be poor. We are a wealthy country that has lost its way. Today we choose to find it again.”

    Newsom, whose California has become both punching bag and proving ground, stepped forward with hard evidence:

    “We’ve already done what skeptics said was impossible. Project Homekey housed tens of thousands in months. We’ve cut red tape, converted underused buildings, built modular at scale, prevented evictions at historic levels. California is no longer just the problem — we are living proof that bold, fast, humane action works. Today we take those tools national: zero excuses, maximum speed, maximum heart. Every state can win this fight.”

    Walz, the heartland progressive who turned compassion into winning policy, spoke straight to forgotten places:

    “This crisis isn’t confined to big cities. It’s in rural Minnesota, in dying small towns, in farm counties where kids leave because they can’t afford to stay. The solution must work in trailer parks and county seats, not just downtown towers. In Minnesota we fed every schoolchild, expanded paid leave, balanced budgets, and still moved forward boldly. That same practical progressivism can — and will — go coast to coast. We meet people where they live, create jobs where they are, and treat every family with the respect they deserve.”

    Sanders closed with the righteous fire that has defined his life’s work:

    “In the richest nation on Earth, no one should sleep on concrete while billionaires hoard obscene wealth. We have the money. We have the land. We have the skilled hands ready to build. What we’ve lacked is the courage to say — without apology that housing is a human right, a living wage is a human right, dignity is a human right. We’re taxing extreme wealth, closing corporate loopholes, redirecting windfall profits, and putting working people first. This isn’t radical. This is justice long overdue.”

    The American Homes & Futures Initiative — Core Commitments

    6 million new permanently affordable, net-zero-ready homes over 10 years: federal-state-local partnerships, modular factories at industrial scale, fast-track permitting, public land repurposed, strong anti-gentrification safeguards, community land trusts.

    35 million high-quality, union-first jobs: construction, clean-energy retrofits, infrastructure, healthcare expansion, care economy, green manufacturing — with apprenticeships, just transitions, and wage standards that rebuild the middle class.

    Permanent supportive housing as national default for chronic homelessness: integrated mental health, addiction recovery, trauma care, job training, income supports — “Housing First” scaled with proven cost savings and life-changing outcomes.

    Equity embedded at every level: targeted investment in historically redlined neighborhoods, rural heartlands, Native communities, small towns hollowed by neglect — prioritizing women, people of color, veterans, formerly incarcerated.

    Smart, sustainable funding: progressive taxation on ultra-wealth and profitable corporations, infrastructure bonds, public-private alignment, local empowerment — no top-down imposition, only community-guided solutions.

    Immediate Action Announced

    Nationwide virtual town halls begin next week

    Open digital platform for public input and local adaptation launches immediately

    Coordinated legislative blitz in Congress and every state capitol

    Grassroots mobilization already underway — millions ready to organize, advocate, demand

    In a time of cynicism and fracture, this image — four leaders from different generations, regions, and lanes of progressivism standing in unbreakable unity — pierced the noise like sunlight.

    They brought proof, not promises.

    Results, not rhetoric.

    Moral urgency fused with practical competence.

    As the event closed, Obama stepped forward one final time.

    “We’re not asking for perfection,” he said. “We’re demanding persistence. We’re not waiting for permission. We’re delivering results. And we’re inviting every American who still believes this country can be better — who still believes we are better — to stand with us.”

    The crowd — advocates, workers, organizers, families — erupted not in chants, but in resolve.

    Because this was never just a policy rollout.

    It was a national awakening.

    America can still solve its hardest problems.

    Progressives can still govern with both heart and competence.

    The fight for housing justice, good jobs, and human dignity is no longer deferred.

    It is here.

    It is now.

    And it will not be stopped.

    The waiting ends today.

    The building begins tomorrow.

    The American Dream the real one is getting its second, unbreakable wind.

  • JUST IN: 40 minutes ago: BREAKING — Reports say panic is spreading across Congress as multiple members meet behind closed doors, urgently trying to wipe digital footprints. The scramble follows claims that Jack Smith uploaded subpoenaed phone records tied to calls from Donald Trump during efforts to delay the 2020 certification. Sources warn the records may reveal coordinated actions at the highest levels. As the files circulate, Washiton is on edge—and pressure is rapidly escalating.

    JUST IN: 40 minutes ago: BREAKING — Reports say panic is spreading across Congress as multiple members meet behind closed doors, urgently trying to wipe digital footprints. The scramble follows claims that Jack Smith uploaded subpoenaed phone records tied to calls from Donald Trump during efforts to delay the 2020 certification. Sources warn the records may reveal coordinated actions at the highest levels. As the files circulate, Washiton is on edge—and pressure is rapidly escalating. Reports circulating in Washington late today have fueled uncertainty and tension on Capitol Hill, as lawmakers grapple with unverified claims involving sensitive digital records tied to the aftermath of the 2020 election. According to multiple media accounts citing anonymous sources, some members of Congress have convened behind closed doors amid concerns about potential exposure of communications linked to efforts to delayThe anxiety reportedly intensified after claims that Special Counsel Jack Smith uploaded subpoenaed phone records connected to calls involving then-President Donald Trump. While details remain unclear and no official confirmation has been released, sources suggest the records could shed light on whether there was coordination among senior political figures during a critical moment in the transfer of power. Neither Smith’s office nor congressional leadership has publicly addressed the allegations. As speculation spreads, Washington remains on edge. Lawmakers from both parties are urging caution, noting that the reports are preliminary and largely based on unnamed sources. Still, the episode underscores the continued political sensitivity surrounding the events of January 2021 and signals that legal and political pressure tied to that period is far from over.

  • 1 MIN AGO: Trump Goes Nuclear as Ivanka’s Timeline Collapses Under New Records

    Claims are spreading online that **Ivanka Trump’s timeline has “collapsed” due to newly surfaced records and that **Donald Trump is “going nuclear” in response. But right now, these are allegations — not confirmed legal facts.

    In real legal situations, timeline shifts only matter if they come from authenticated sources: official court filings, docket entries, sworn testimony, verified government releases, or properly introduced business records. Viral screenshots, threads, and clipped videos are not proof by themselves.

    A true escalation would leave a procedural footprint — things like new motions, court orders, subpoenas, or formal legal responses. Without that paper trail, this remains narrative, not verified action.

    Many “timeline collapse” stories turn out to be recycled documents, missing context, time-zone confusion, or misread metadata. Others may raise real questions — but only verification decides that.

    So the checklist is simple: show the docket, show the authenticated record, show why the discrepancy is material. Until then, treat this as an unverified claim, not a confirmed legal turning point.

    If you want, I can also convert this into a 60-second voiceover script format.

  • BREAKING: The United States Senate has reportedly secured enough votes to block a proposed election bill backed by Donald Trump, intensifying the national debate over voting laws ahead of the 2026 elections.

    BREAKING: The United States Senate has reportedly secured enough votes to block a proposed election bill backed by Donald Trump, intensifying the national debate over voting laws ahead of the 2026 elections. BREAKING: The United States Senate has reportedly secured enough votes to block a proposed election bill backed by Donald Trump, intensifying the national debate over voting laws ahead of the 2026 electionsBREAKING: The United States Senate has reportedly secured enough votes to block a proposed election bill backed by Donald Trump, intensifying the national debate over voting laws ahead of the 2026 elections.

  • Mark Kelly just made the move we’ve been waiting for. He is officially calling for the impeachment of JD Vance Raise your hand if you agree 

    Mark Kelly just made the move we’ve been waiting for.
    He is officially calling for the impeachment of JD Vance
    Raise your hand if you agreeMark Kelly**, a Democratic senator from Arizona and retired Navy captain, has been involved in a high-profile legal and political dispute with the federal government — but **there is no credible reporting that he *officially* called for the impeachment of Vice President **J. D. Vance**.**

    Instead, recent developments focus on Kelly’s **speech rights and free-speech protections** connected to a controversial video he and other lawmakers posted. In that video, Kelly urged U.S. military personnel to refuse *unlawful orders*, a position that drew fierce criticism from the Trump administration and led to an unprecedented push by Pentagon leadership to punish him for it.A **federal judge recently blocked the Pentagon** from punishing Kelly — including efforts to censure him or reduce his military retirement benefits — holding that doing so would likely violate his **First Amendment** free-speech rights. ([ABC7 New York][1])
    * The judge’s ruling came after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth sought disciplinary action against Kelly for the video. ([ABC7 New York][1])
    * A grand jury also declined to indict Kelly and other lawmakers involved in the video on criminal charges earlier this week. ([The Guardian][2])This legal battle is tied to broader debates in U.S. politics about:

    * **Free speech and military discipline**, especially for retired service members. ([ABC7 New York][1])
    * The limits of exec­­utive and pentagon authority over elected officials. ([ABC7 New York][1])
    * Political tensions between Democrats and the current Republican administration — not an impeachment process targeting the vice president at this time.

    ### * There is **no verified news report** from credible outlets stating that Kelly has publicly *called for or filed any impeachment resolution* against Vice President Vance. All verified coverage is centered on Kelly’s free-speech dispute with Pentagon authorities.
    * Impeachment of a vice president requires a formal process in the U.S. House of Representatives, followed by a trial in the Senate. No such action involving Vance linked to Kelly has been confirmed.

  • BREAKING: Trump is gone   Democrats are calibrating with a moderate Republicans to Impeach Trump immediately for racism after the White House targeted the Obamas as Apes Raise your hand if you want Trump impeached immediately 

    BREAKING: Trump is gone Democrats are calibrating with a moderate Republicans to Impeach Trump immediately for racism after the White House targeted the Obamas as Apes
    Raise your hand if you want Trump impeached immediately Washington, D.C. — Political tensions escalated sharply today following allegations that the White House circulated or endorsed imagery widely condemned as racist and targeting former President Barack Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama.In response, members of the Democratic Party announced they are in discussions with a group of moderate lawmakers from the Republican Party to explore the possibility of initiating impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump. Democratic leaders described the alleged incident as “deeply offensive” and “unbecoming of the office of the presidency,” arguing that it could warrant immediate congressional review.

    Some Republican lawmakers have urged caution, calling for a thorough investigation into the authenticity and origin of the material before taking formal legislative action. Others have emphasized the need to lower political tensions and avoid rushing into impeachment without clear evidence.

    The White House has not yet issued a detailed statement addressing the specific claims but has previously denied accusations of racial animus. Political analysts note that any move toward impeachment would require broad bipartisan support in the House of Representatives and face significant hurdles in the Senate.

    As developments continue to unfold, congressional leaders from both parties are expected to meet privately to determine next steps

  • CLAIMS OF TAPES RAISE NEW POLITICAL SHOCKWAVES An Epstein victim has alleged that there are tapes involving Donald Trump that could force him to resign from the presidency. The claim, if proven true, would carry enormous legal and political consequences.

    CLAIMS OF TAPES RAISE NEW POLITICAL SHOCKWAVES

    An Epstein victim has alleged that there are tapes involving Donald Trump that could force him to resign from the presidency. The claim, if proven true, would carry enormous legal and political consequences.

    However, as of now, such allegations remain unverified, and no publicly released evidence has confirmed the existence of tapes that would compel resignation.

    Extraordinary claims demand credible proof. In high-profile cases tied to Jeffrey Epstein, accusations often generate intense media attention and political reaction long before facts are fully established.

    Until documented evidence is presented and independently verified, these statements remain allegations — not confirmed findings.

  • BREAKING: Jeffrey Epstein survivors have announced that they will release their own list of names—along with details of when and where it will be made public. “We know who abused us. We saw who came and went,” they said. “This list will be survivor-led—for survivors.” But the revelations didn’t stop there. Survivor Juliette Bryant went further, making a striking comment involving former President Donald Trump—one that has left many stunned and sparked intense speculation. Now, one question is dominating the conversation: How will Donald Trump respond to Juliette Bryant’s statement?

    A group of survivors connected to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein has announced plans to release their own list of names, saying it will identify individuals they claim were involved in or connected to their abuse.

    The group has not yet disclosed when or where the list will be made public.

    “We know who abused us. We saw who came and went,” the survivors said in a joint statement. “This list will be survivor-led—for survivors.”

    The announcement has already drawn widespread attention, but further comments from Epstein survivor Juliette Bryant intensified the public reactionBryant made a pointed statement referencing former U.S. President Donald Trump, prompting renewed speculation and debate online.While no evidence has been presented alongside the remarks, the comments have fueled questions across social media and political circles, with many now watching closely to see whether Trump or his representatives will respond.

    As anticipation grows, observers emphasize that any forthcoming claims will need to be independently verified once released

  • JUST IN…Thomas Moves to Arrest Jasmine Cr0ckett — But Within 20 Minutes, She Turns the Entire Court Against Him! The moment Clarence Thomas signaled for Cr0ckett’s arrest, reporters nearly fell out of their chairs. But Cr0ckett didn’t back down — she att@cked. Over the next 20 minutes, she delivered a blistering, airtight defense, exposing procedural violations and calling out Thomas’ conflicts of interest with surgical precision. The courtroom shifted. Aides whispered nervously behind Thomas. Judges began exchanging looks. By the time Cr0ckett finished, Thomas was no longer the accuser — he was the one under scrutiny because….

    JUST IN…Thomas Moves to Arrest Jasmine Cr0ckett — But Within 20 Minutes, She Turns the Entire Court Against Him! The moment Clarence Thomas signaled for Cr0ckett’s arrest, reporters nearly fell out of their chairs.

    But Cr0ckett didn’t back down — she att@cked. Over the next 20 minutes, she delivered a blistering, airtight defense, exposing procedural violations and calling out Thomas’ conflicts of interest with surgical precision. The courtroom shifted. Aides whispered nervously behind Thomas.

    Judges began exchanging looks. By the time Cr0ckett finished, Thomas was no longer the accuser — he was the one under scrutiny because….

  • BREAKING: Senator Ruben Gallego HAMMERS Renee Good’s ICE murderer for recording the shooting on his phone and “trying to be an influencer” while he was killing her.

    After Renee Good was shot the agent called her, I quote, a ‘f*cking b*tch’ on camera. Yes or no, is this how your agents are trained to act?” Gallego asked Border Protection Commissioner Rodney Scott.

    “No sir,” conceded Scott.

    That blunt opening salvo out of the way, Gallego then dug into the meat of his well-founded criticisms—

    “Director Lyons, you are trained in weapons handling, correct?” Gallego asked Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons.

    “Yes, sir,” said Lyons.

    “If you look at the Rene Good shooting, why is the agent holding a camera phone and a weapon at the same time?” asked Gallego.

    “So sir, I don’t want to comment on the ongoing investigation just because that’s still being determined at this time, but can I just go back to one thing, sir, that you mentioned?” said Lyons.

    “No, I want to ask a further question on this. Has there ever been an order to any agents, CBP agents in Minnesota or other places, for them to be recording on their personal phones to essentially be somewhat social influencers or to pass the media on up?” asked Gallego. “Has there ever been any orders given for agents to be recording while they’re doing these stops or engaging with the public?”

    “Sir, there’s never been an order to do that,” admitted Lyons. “Agents have used it as far as if they were going to make an arrest on, say an agitator, the U.S. attorney was requiring to have video leading up to the event. So officers have reused that for that.”

    “For video from a handheld, from a phone?” asked Gallego.

    “If they had a body camera available from the body camera or from any type of recording device,” said Lyons.

    “The reason there’s a difference because the body cam is designed for a police officer or law enforcement to engage while still being able to have full scope of knowledge of what’s happening, be able to detain, be able to escalate if they need to escalate,” pointed out Gallego. “What I saw and what the world saw for me is the fact that there was an agent that was moving around a vehicle with a camera phone recording and his hand on the weapon.”

    “In what world, in what training, between all of your training in weapons handling, have you ever been taught the appropriate use of holding a weapon and at the same time recording on a camera phone?” asked Gallego. “Did you have any of that type of training at all in your time in ICE, law enforcement, or through CBP?”

    Gallego himself is a former Marine who served in Iraq, so he is well-acquainted with the proper use of firearms. In no situation would it make sense for someone to be using a camera phone while also wielding a weapon. The staggering lack of discipline dispolayed bby Good’s killer Jonathan Ross underlines just how poorly trained these ICE agents are. They delight in violence but that’s not enough for them, they also want to film it.

    “No, sir, I haven’t,” Lyons told Gallego. “But again, you know, we look at every instance no matter what it is so…

    “So shouldn’t there be some kind of command or directive that comes down from CBP headquarters knowing that this is unprofessional conduct that probably created and put the officer and probably the civilian in a situation that ended up escalating to a shooting, that maybe you shouldn’t be holding a camera trying to be influencer and wielding a weapon at the same time?” said Gallego. “That is a professional code of conduct as law enforcement, as military, you would never do that because you know you cannot handle a weapon, assess the situation, and be able to determine to escalate or deescalate.”

    “Did you issue any type of direction after Ms. Good was shot saying that this is not what you should be doing or we’re just accepting that this is going to continue going forward?” asked Gallego.

    “No, sir, there was nothing issued because we do hold our individuals accountable,” Lyons said weakly.

    Gallego should be commended for zeroing in on this particular facet of the Good killing. The Trump administration has tried to smear an innocent mother by claiming that her killer felt endangered by her actions. But if that were the case, Ross wouldn’t have been comfortable enough to film the entire encounter. The truth is that this agent was excited by the prospect of finally getting to use his gun on someone and he seized the opportunity. He should be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law